US: GTFS static - Secure Internet (ITS)

Description

This solution is used within Canada and the U.S.. It combines standards associated with US: GTFS static with those for I–I: Secure Internet (ITS). The US: GTFS static standards include upper–layer standards required to implement static, public, transit–related communications. The I–I: Secure Internet (ITS) standards include lower–layer standards that support secure communications between ITS equipment using X.509 or IEEE 1609.2 security certificates.

Includes Standards

LevelDocNumFullNameDescription
MgmtIETF RFC 3411An Architecture for Describing Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Management FrameworksThis standard (RFC) defines the basic architecture for SNMPv3 and includes the definition of information objects for managing the SNMP entity's architecture.
MgmtIETF RFC 3412Message Processing and Dispatching for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)This standard (RFC) contains a MIB that assists in managing the message processing and dispatching subsystem of an SNMP entity.
MgmtIETF RFC 3413Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) ApplicationsThis standard (RFC) includes MIBs that allow for the configuration and management of remote Targets, Notifications, and Proxys.
MgmtIETF RFC 3414User–based Security Model (USM) for version 3 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv3)This standard (RFC) contains a MIB that assists in configuring and managing the user–based security model.
MgmtIETF RFC 3415View–based Access Control Model (VACM) for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)This standard (RFC) contains a MIB that supports the configuration and management of the View–based access control model of SNMP.
MgmtIETF RFC 3416Version 2 of the Protocol Operations for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)This standard (RFC) defines the message structure and protocol operations used by SNMPv3.
MgmtIETF RFC 3418Management Information Base (MIB) for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)This standard (RFC) defines the MIB to configure and manage an SNMP entity.
MgmtIETF RFC 4293Management Information Base for the Internet Protocol (IP)This standard (RFC) defines the MIB that manages an IP entity.
SecurityIETF RFC 5280Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) ProfileThis standard (RFC) defines how to use X.509 certificates for secure communications over the Internet.
SecurityIETF RFC 8446The Transport Layer Security (TLS) ProtocolThis standard (RFC) specifies Version 1.3 of the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol. The TLS protocol provides communications security over the Internet. The protocol allows client/server applications to communicate in a way that is designed to prevent eavesdropping, tampering, or message forgery.
ITS Application EntityGTFSGeneral Transit Feed SpecificationThis document defines a common (open data) format for exchanging public transportation schedules and associated geographic information.
FacilitiesIETF RFC 9110HTTP SemanticsThe Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is a stateless application–level protocol for distributed, collaborative, hypertext information systems. This document describes the overall architecture of HTTP, establishes common terminology, and defines aspects of the protocol that are shared by all versions. In this definition are core protocol elements, extensibility mechanisms, and the "http" and "https" Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) schemes.
FacilitiesIETF RFC 9112HTTP/1.1The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is a stateless application–level protocol for distributed, collaborative, hypertext information systems. This document specifies the HTTP/1.1 message syntax, message parsing, connection management, and related security concerns.
FacilitiesISO 21320–1Information technology — Document Container File — Part 1: CoreISO/IEC 21320–1 specifies the core requirements for 1) document container files, and 2) implementations that produce and/or consume document container files. It normatively references the Zip File Format Specification version 6.3.3 of PKWARE(R) Inc. Document container files are conforming Zip files as specified by that document.
FacilitiesIETF RFC 4180Common Format and MIME Type for Comma–Separated Values (CSV) FilesThis standard (RFC) documents the format used for Comma–Separated Values (CSV) files and registers the associated MIME type "text/csv".
FacilitiesIETF RFC 7159The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange FormatThe JavaScript Object Notation (JSON), a lightweight, text–based, language–independent data interchange format. It was derived from the ECMAScript Programming Language Standard. JSON defines a small set of formatting rules for the portable representation of structured data. This document removes inconsistencies with other specifications of JSON, repairs specification errors, and offers experience–based interoperability guidance.
TransNetIETF RFC 4291IP Version 6 Addressing ArchitectureThis standard (RFC) defines the addressing architecture of the IP Version 6 (IPv6) protocol. It includes the IPv6 addressing model, text representations of IPv6 addresses, definition of IPv6 unicast addresses, anycast addresses, and multicast addresses, and an IPv6 node's required addresses.
TransNetIETF RFC 4443Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMPv6) for the Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) SpecificationThis standard (RFC) defines the control messages to manage IPv6.
TransNetIETF RFC 8200Internet Protocol, Version 6This document specifies version 6 of the Internet Protocol (IPv6).
TransNetIETF RFC 9293Transmission Control ProtocolThis document specifies the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP). TCP is an important transport–layer protocol in the Internet protocol stack, and it has continuously evolved over decades of use and growth of the Internet. Over this time, a number of changes have been made to TCP as it was specified in RFC 793, though these have only been documented in a piecemeal fashion. This document collects and brings those changes together with the protocol specification from RFC 793. This document obsoletes RFC 793, as well as RFCs 879, 2873, 6093, 6429, 6528, and 6691 that updated parts of RFC 793. It updates RFCs 1011 and 1122, and it should be considered as a replacement for the portions of those documents dealing with TCP requirements. It also updates RFC 5961 by adding a small clarification in reset handling while in the SYN–RECEIVED state. The TCP header control bits from RFC 793 have also been updated based on RFC 3168.
Access Internet Subnet AlternativesA set of alternative standards that includes any Subnet Layer method of connecting to the Internet.

Readiness: Moderate

Readiness Description

Two significant or one significant and several minor issues. For existing deployments, the chosen solution is likely deficient in security or management capabilities and the issues should be reviewed and upgrades developed as needed. For new deployments, the solution may be viable for pilots when applied to the triples it supports; such pilot deployments should consider a path to addressing these issues as a part of their design activities. The solution does not provide sufficient interoperability, management, and security to enable proper, full–scale deployment without additional work.

Issues

IssueSeverityDescriptionAssociated StandardAssociated Triple
Data not fully defined (medium)MediumSome of the data elements for this information flow are not fully defined.(None)Regional Transportation Authority Travel Information Center (TIC)=>transit and fare schedules=>City of Chicago DOT Transportation Website
Data not fully defined (medium)MediumSome of the data elements for this information flow are not fully defined.(None)Chicago Transit Authority Control Center=>transit and fare schedules=>Regional Transportation Authority Travel Information Center (TIC)
Data not fully defined (medium)MediumSome of the data elements for this information flow are not fully defined.(None)Chicago Transit Authority Control Center=>transit and fare schedules=>Chicago Transit Authority Bus Tracker Website
Data not fully defined (medium)MediumSome of the data elements for this information flow are not fully defined.(None)RTA/NITA Transit Hub=>transit and fare schedules=>Pace Regional Ridesharing and Vanpooling
Data not fully defined (medium)MediumSome of the data elements for this information flow are not fully defined.(None)RTA/NITA Transit Hub=>transit and fare schedules=>Private ISPs – Travel Information Services
Data not fully defined (medium)MediumSome of the data elements for this information flow are not fully defined.(None)RTA/NITA Transit Hub=>transit and fare schedules=>Regional Transportation Authority Travel Information Center (TIC)
Data not fully defined (medium)MediumSome of the data elements for this information flow are not fully defined.(None)Metra Passenger Information Display System=>transit and fare schedules=>RTA/NITA Transit Hub
Data not fully defined (medium)MediumSome of the data elements for this information flow are not fully defined.(None)Metra Consolidated Control Facility=>transit and fare schedules=>IDOT District 1 Traffic Systems Center (TSC)
Data not fully defined (medium)MediumSome of the data elements for this information flow are not fully defined.(None)Metra Consolidated Control Facility=>transit and fare schedules=>RTA/NITA Transit Hub
Data not fully defined (medium)MediumSome of the data elements for this information flow are not fully defined.(None)Pace Control Center (IBS)=>transit and fare schedules=>RTA/NITA Transit Hub
Data not fully defined (medium)MediumSome of the data elements for this information flow are not fully defined.(None)Pace Control Center (IBS)=>transit and fare schedules=>Regional Transportation Authority Travel Information Center (TIC)
Data not fully defined (medium)MediumSome of the data elements for this information flow are not fully defined.(None)Chicago Transit Authority Control Center=>transit and fare schedules=>RTA/NITA Transit Hub
Data not fully defined (medium)MediumSome of the data elements for this information flow are not fully defined.(None)Private Bus Dispatch=>transit and fare schedules=>RTA/NITA Transit Hub
Data not fully defined (medium)MediumSome of the data elements for this information flow are not fully defined.(None)Chicago Transit Authority Bus Info System=>transit and fare schedules=>RTA/NITA Transit Hub
Data not fully defined (medium)MediumSome of the data elements for this information flow are not fully defined.(None)Metra GPS Center (TIMS)=>transit and fare schedules=>RTA/NITA Transit Hub
Data not fully defined (medium)MediumSome of the data elements for this information flow are not fully defined.(None)Chicago Transit Authority ATSS System=>transit and fare schedules=>RTA/NITA Transit Hub
Data not fully defined (medium)MediumSome of the data elements for this information flow are not fully defined.(None)Pace Regional Paratransit Dispatch=>transit and fare schedules=>RTA/NITA Transit Hub
Performance not fully defined (medium)MediumThe performance rules are not fully defined for this information flow.(None)(All)
Secure data access not providedMediumThe solution does not define rules on how the application entity authenticates requests to accept or provide data.(None)(All)
Use case not considered in design (medium)MediumWhile the indicated standards nominally address the information flow, the design may not meet practical constraints because this particular use case was not the focus of the design effort.(None)AMTRAK Rail=>alternate mode service data=>RTA/NITA Transit Hub
Use case not considered in design (medium)MediumWhile the indicated standards nominally address the information flow, the design may not meet practical constraints because this particular use case was not the focus of the design effort.(None)Chicago Airports=>alternate mode service data=>Chicago Transit Authority Control Center
Use case not considered in design (medium)MediumWhile the indicated standards nominally address the information flow, the design may not meet practical constraints because this particular use case was not the focus of the design effort.(None)Chicago Airports=>alternate mode service data=>Regional Transportation Authority Travel Information Center (TIC)
Use case not considered in design (medium)MediumWhile the indicated standards nominally address the information flow, the design may not meet practical constraints because this particular use case was not the focus of the design effort.(None)Water Taxi Service=>alternate mode service data=>Metra Consolidated Control Facility
Use case not considered in design (medium)MediumWhile the indicated standards nominally address the information flow, the design may not meet practical constraints because this particular use case was not the focus of the design effort.(None)Neighboring Airports=>alternate mode service data=>Regional Transportation Authority Travel Information Center (TIC)
Not a standard (minor)LowThe document is publicly available and widely used but it is not currently a formal standard.General Transit Feed Specification(All)

Supports Interfaces

SourceDestinationFlow
AMTRAK RailRTA/NITA Transit Hubalternate mode service data
Chicago AirportsChicago Transit Authority Control Centeralternate mode service data
Chicago AirportsRegional Transportation Authority Travel Information Center (TIC)alternate mode service data
Chicago Transit Authority ATSS SystemRTA/NITA Transit Hubtransit and fare schedules
Chicago Transit Authority Bus Info SystemRTA/NITA Transit Hubtransit and fare schedules
Chicago Transit Authority Bus Info SystemRTA/NITA Transit Hubtransit fare coordination
Chicago Transit Authority Bus Info SystemRTA/NITA Transit Hubtransit fare information
Chicago Transit Authority Control CenterChicago Airportstransit alternate mode information
Chicago Transit Authority Control CenterChicago Transit Authority Bus Tracker Websitetransit and fare schedules
Chicago Transit Authority Control CenterChicago Transit Authority Bus Tracker Websitetransit fare information
Chicago Transit Authority Control CenterRegional Transportation Authority Travel Information Center (TIC)transit and fare schedules
Chicago Transit Authority Control CenterRTA/NITA Transit Hubtransit and fare schedules
Metra Consolidated Control FacilityIDOT District 1 Traffic Systems Center (TSC)transit and fare schedules
Metra Consolidated Control FacilityRTA/NITA Transit Hubtransit and fare schedules
Metra Consolidated Control FacilityWater Taxi Servicetransit alternate mode information
Metra GPS Center (TIMS)RTA/NITA Transit Hubtransit and fare schedules
Metra Passenger Information Display SystemRTA/NITA Transit Hubtransit and fare schedules
Neighboring AirportsRegional Transportation Authority Travel Information Center (TIC)alternate mode service data
Other Regional Paratransit DispatchPace Control Center (IBS)transit fare coordination
Other Regional Paratransit DispatchPace Regional Paratransit Dispatchtransit fare coordination
Pace BusInfo SystemPace WebWatch Internet Sitetransit fare information
Pace Control Center (IBS)Other Regional Paratransit Dispatchtransit fare coordination
Pace Control Center (IBS)Regional Transportation Authority Travel Information Center (TIC)transit and fare schedules
Pace Control Center (IBS)RTA/NITA Transit Hubtransit and fare schedules
Pace Regional Paratransit DispatchOther Regional Paratransit Dispatchtransit fare coordination
Pace Regional Paratransit DispatchRTA/NITA Transit Hubtransit and fare schedules
Private Bus DispatchRTA/NITA Transit Hubtransit and fare schedules
Regional Transportation Authority Travel Information Center (TIC)City of Chicago DOT Transportation Websitetransit and fare schedules
RTA/NITA Transit HubAMTRAK Railtransit alternate mode information
RTA/NITA Transit HubChicago Transit Authority Bus Info Systemtransit fare coordination
RTA/NITA Transit HubPace Regional Ridesharing and Vanpoolingtransit and fare schedules
RTA/NITA Transit HubPrivate ISPs – Travel Information Servicestransit and fare schedules
RTA/NITA Transit HubRegional Transportation Authority Travel Information Center (TIC)transit and fare schedules
Water Taxi ServiceMetra Consolidated Control Facilityalternate mode service data